Journal article
Gustavo Grullon, John Hund, James Weston
Journal of Financial Intermediation, vol. 33(January), 2018 18, pp. 1-15 (lead article)
Journal of Financial Intermediation, vol. 33(January), 2018 18, pp. 1-15 (lead article)
Cite
Cite
APA
Click to copy
Grullon, G., Hund, J., & Weston, J. (2018). Concentrating on Q and Cash Flow. Journal of Financial Intermediation, 33(January), 1–15 (lead article). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfi.2017.10.001
Chicago/Turabian
Click to copy
Grullon, Gustavo, John Hund, and James Weston. “Concentrating on Q and Cash Flow.” Journal of Financial Intermediation 33, no. January (December 18, 2018): 1–15 (lead article).
MLA
Click to copy
Grullon, Gustavo, et al. “Concentrating on Q and Cash Flow.” Journal of Financial Intermediation, vol. 33, no. January, Dec. 2018, pp. 1–15 (lead article), doi:10.1016/j.jfi.2017.10.001.
BibTeX Click to copy
@article{gustavo2018a,
title = {Concentrating on Q and Cash Flow},
year = {2018},
month = dec,
day = {18},
issue = {January},
journal = {Journal of Financial Intermediation},
pages = {1-15 (lead article)},
volume = {33},
doi = {10.1016/j.jfi.2017.10.001},
author = {Grullon, Gustavo and Hund, John and Weston, James},
month_numeric = {12}
}
Abstract
Investment spending by US public firms is highly concentrated. The 100 largest spenders account for 60% of total capital expenditures and drive most of the variation in aggregate investment. This high concentration creates a disconnect between the average public firm and macroeconomic aggregates. For large firms, cash flow remains the primary driver of investment spending and has not declined in importance as it has for smaller public firms. The cash flowing to big spenders provides a better forecast of future investment opportunities than noisy proxies for Tobin's q even though these firms are not financially constrained. These results suggest that, at least for the largest spenders, it is unlikely that measurement error drives the significance of cash flow. Our results are also inconsistent with recent models that predict higher investment-cash flow sensitivity for small young growth firms and suggest that cash flow is still the most important determinant of macroeconomic fluctuations in investment spending.
Investment spending by US public firms is highly concentrated. The 100 largest spenders account for 60% of total capital expenditures and drive most of the variation in aggregate investment. This high concentration creates a disconnect between the average public firm and macroeconomic aggregates. For large firms, cash flow remains the primary driver of investment spending and has not declined in importance as it has for smaller public firms. The cash flowing to big spenders provides a better forecast of future investment opportunities than noisy proxies for Tobin's q even though these firms are not financially constrained. These results suggest that, at least for the largest spenders, it is unlikely that measurement error drives the significance of cash flow. Our results are also inconsistent with recent models that predict higher investment-cash flow sensitivity for small young growth firms and suggest that cash flow is still the most important determinant of macroeconomic fluctuations in investment spending.